Case Study: Earthwork & Wet Utilities Estimating – BHS Animal & Plant Science Remodel

The BHS Animal & Plant Science Remodel is a single-story renovation project in Bentonville, Arkansas, involving interior upgrades and limited exterior utility modifications to support new plumbing fixtures, mechanical systems, and building openings.

BHS- 1

The BHS Animal & Plant Science Remodel is a single-story renovation project in Bentonville, Arkansas, involving interior upgrades and limited exterior utility modifications to support new plumbing fixtures, mechanical systems, and building openings.

The Earthwork & Wet Utilities scope is focused on localized excavation and underground utility work, not full site development. The work is primarily tied to:

  • New sanitary sewer modifications
  • Plumbing trench excavation and backfill
  • Exterior tie-ins at building perimeter
  • Minor grading and restoration

Relevant drawings include:

  • P2.0 – Plumbing Demolition Plan
  • P2.1 – Plumbing Plan
  • S3.1 – Structural Notes (slab demo and trenching)
  • A2.0 – Demolition Plan
  • A2.1 – Floor Plan (utility penetration locations)

Structural notes confirm:

“Slab demo and pourback as required to remove and cap sanitary sewer lines.”

This indicates trenching and underground work tied directly to plumbing modifications.


2. TRADE ABSTRACT / SCOPE OVERVIEW

The Earthwork & Wet Utilities subcontractor scope includes:


A. Earthwork

  • Sawcut and trench excavation (interior and exterior)
  • Excavation for sanitary piping
  • Subgrade preparation
  • Backfill and compaction
  • Fine grading and surface restoration

B. Wet Utilities Installation

  • Sanitary sewer piping
  • Vent piping below slab
  • Cleanouts
  • Pipe bedding
  • Connections to existing system

C. Accessories

  • Pipe fittings (wyes, tees, bends)
  • Bedding sand
  • Trench backfill material
  • Warning tape
  • Compaction materials

D. Labor & Equipment

  • Excavation crew
  • Compaction crew
  • Pipe installation crew
  • Equipment (mini-excavator, trenchers, compactors)

3. PLAN REVIEW PROCESS


Step 1 – Plumbing Sheets (P2.0 & P2.1)

Start with plumbing drawings to identify:

  • New sanitary routing
  • Pipe sizes
  • Fixture connections
  • Tie-in points

These determine trench lengths and pipe quantities.


Step 2 – Structural Coordination (S3.1)

Structural notes confirm trenching locations under slab and required restoration.

This defines excavation areas.


Step 3 – Architectural Floor Plan (A2.1)

Used to:

  • Verify fixture locations
  • Estimate pipe routing distances
  • Identify exterior tie-ins

Step 4 – Demolition Plan (A2.0)

Confirms:

  • Slab removal areas
  • Existing piping removal zones

4. ESTIMATION PREPARATION STEPS


Assumptions

  • Average trench width: 2’-0”
  • Average trench depth: 3’-0”
  • Soil assumed workable (no rock)
  • Dewatering not required
  • Existing utilities accessible for tie-in
  • One mobilization

Waste Factors

  • Pipe: 5%
  • Bedding material: 10%
  • Backfill: 10%

Labor Assumptions

Prevailing wage productivity:

  • Trenching (machine): 25 LF/hr
  • Pipe installation: 12 LF/hr
  • Backfill/compaction: 30 LF/hr

Constructability Considerations

  • Interior trenching reduces productivity
  • Tight working areas
  • Coordination with slab demolition
  • Utility tie-in uncertainty

These increase labor costs significantly.


5. DETAILED MATERIAL TAKEOFF


A. Sanitary Sewer Piping

Assume based on fixture layout:

  • Main line: 60 LF (4” pipe)
  • Branch lines: 80 LF (3” pipe)

Total pipe:

140 LF

Waste @5%:

140 × 1.05 = 147 LF


B. Trench Excavation

Total trench length:

140 LF

Volume:

Width: 2’
Depth: 3’

140 × 2 × 3 = 840 CF = 31 CY


C. Bedding Material

Assume 6” bedding:

140 × 2 × 0.5 = 140 CF = 5.2 CY

Waste @10%:

5.2 × 1.10 = 5.7 CY


D. Backfill

Excavation minus pipe volume:

Approx. 25 CY compacted fill

Waste @10%:

28 CY


E. Fittings / Cleanouts

Assume:

  • 6 fittings
  • 2 cleanouts

6. LABOR & PRICING BUILD-UP (Prevailing Wage)


Material Pricing


Pipe:

147 LF × $18 = $2,646


Fittings:

6 × $85 = $510


Cleanouts:

2 × $150 = $300


Bedding:

5.7 CY × $65 = $371


Backfill:

28 CY × $45 = $1,260


Material Total:

$5,087


Labor Pricing


Excavation:

140 ÷ 25 = 5.6 hrs
5.6 × $65 = $364


Pipe Installation:

140 ÷ 12 = 11.7 hrs
11.7 × $72 = $842


Backfill/Compaction:

140 ÷ 30 = 4.7 hrs
4.7 × $65 = $306


Labor Total:

$1,512


Equipment

Mini-excavator, compactor, trench tools:
$1,250


Direct Cost

$5,087 + $1,512 + $1,250 = $7,849


O&P

Overhead 10%

$785

Profit 10%

$863


Tax (8% material)

$407


Final Earthwork & Wet Utilities Estimate:

$9,904


7. FINAL ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Cost ItemAmount
Materials$5,087
Labor$1,512
Equipment$1,250
Tax$407
O&P$1,648
Final Estimate Total$9,904

8. ESTIMATOR NOTES / PROFESSIONAL INSIGHTS

This scope is small in quantity but critical in sequencing, as it directly impacts plumbing, foundation restoration, and slab replacement.

Key cost drivers:

  1. Trenching under existing slab
  2. Utility tie-in complexity
  3. Backfill and compaction requirements
  4. Limited access conditions
  5. Coordination with plumbing and concrete trades

Even though only 140 LF of piping is installed, the cost reflects:

  • Mobilization inefficiencies
  • Interior excavation constraints
  • Coordination risks

Key Risks:

  • Unknown existing utility depth/location
  • Potential conflicts with structural elements
  • Soil variability
  • Inspection delays

Recommended Bid Clarifications:

  • Rock excavation excluded
  • Dewatering excluded
  • Existing utility locations assumed accurate
  • Compaction testing by others
  • One mobilization included

More UPDATES