Case Study: Earthwork & Wet Utilities Estimating – BHS Animal & Plant Science Remodel

The BHS Animal & Plant Science Remodel is a single-story renovation project in Bentonville, Arkansas, involving interior upgrades and limited exterior utility modifications to support new plumbing fixtures, mechanical systems, and building openings.

BHS- 1

The BHS Animal & Plant Science Remodel is a single-story renovation project in Bentonville, Arkansas, involving interior upgrades and limited exterior utility modifications to support new plumbing fixtures, mechanical systems, and building openings.

The Earthwork & Wet Utilities scope is focused on localized excavation and underground utility work, not full site development. The work is primarily tied to:

  • New sanitary sewer modifications
  • Plumbing trench excavation and backfill
  • Exterior tie-ins at building perimeter
  • Minor grading and restoration

Relevant drawings include:

  • P2.0 – Plumbing Demolition Plan
  • P2.1 – Plumbing Plan
  • S3.1 – Structural Notes (slab demo and trenching)
  • A2.0 – Demolition Plan
  • A2.1 – Floor Plan (utility penetration locations)

Structural notes confirm:

“Slab demo and pourback as required to remove and cap sanitary sewer lines.”

This indicates trenching and underground work tied directly to plumbing modifications.


2. TRADE ABSTRACT / SCOPE OVERVIEW

The Earthwork & Wet Utilities subcontractor scope includes:


A. Earthwork

  • Sawcut and trench excavation (interior and exterior)
  • Excavation for sanitary piping
  • Subgrade preparation
  • Backfill and compaction
  • Fine grading and surface restoration

B. Wet Utilities Installation

  • Sanitary sewer piping
  • Vent piping below slab
  • Cleanouts
  • Pipe bedding
  • Connections to existing system

C. Accessories

  • Pipe fittings (wyes, tees, bends)
  • Bedding sand
  • Trench backfill material
  • Warning tape
  • Compaction materials

D. Labor & Equipment

  • Excavation crew
  • Compaction crew
  • Pipe installation crew
  • Equipment (mini-excavator, trenchers, compactors)

3. PLAN REVIEW PROCESS


Step 1 – Plumbing Sheets (P2.0 & P2.1)

Start with plumbing drawings to identify:

  • New sanitary routing
  • Pipe sizes
  • Fixture connections
  • Tie-in points

These determine trench lengths and pipe quantities.


Step 2 – Structural Coordination (S3.1)

Structural notes confirm trenching locations under slab and required restoration.

This defines excavation areas.


Step 3 – Architectural Floor Plan (A2.1)

Used to:

  • Verify fixture locations
  • Estimate pipe routing distances
  • Identify exterior tie-ins

Step 4 – Demolition Plan (A2.0)

Confirms:

  • Slab removal areas
  • Existing piping removal zones

4. ESTIMATION PREPARATION STEPS


Assumptions

  • Average trench width: 2’-0”
  • Average trench depth: 3’-0”
  • Soil assumed workable (no rock)
  • Dewatering not required
  • Existing utilities accessible for tie-in
  • One mobilization

Waste Factors

  • Pipe: 5%
  • Bedding material: 10%
  • Backfill: 10%

Labor Assumptions

Prevailing wage productivity:

  • Trenching (machine): 25 LF/hr
  • Pipe installation: 12 LF/hr
  • Backfill/compaction: 30 LF/hr

Constructability Considerations

  • Interior trenching reduces productivity
  • Tight working areas
  • Coordination with slab demolition
  • Utility tie-in uncertainty

These increase labor costs significantly.


5. DETAILED MATERIAL TAKEOFF


A. Sanitary Sewer Piping

Assume based on fixture layout:

  • Main line: 60 LF (4” pipe)
  • Branch lines: 80 LF (3” pipe)

Total pipe:

140 LF

Waste @5%:

140 × 1.05 = 147 LF


B. Trench Excavation

Total trench length:

140 LF

Volume:

Width: 2’
Depth: 3’

140 × 2 × 3 = 840 CF = 31 CY


C. Bedding Material

Assume 6” bedding:

140 × 2 × 0.5 = 140 CF = 5.2 CY

Waste @10%:

5.2 × 1.10 = 5.7 CY


D. Backfill

Excavation minus pipe volume:

Approx. 25 CY compacted fill

Waste @10%:

28 CY


E. Fittings / Cleanouts

Assume:

  • 6 fittings
  • 2 cleanouts

6. LABOR & PRICING BUILD-UP (Prevailing Wage)


Material Pricing


Pipe:

147 LF × $18 = $2,646


Fittings:

6 × $85 = $510


Cleanouts:

2 × $150 = $300


Bedding:

5.7 CY × $65 = $371


Backfill:

28 CY × $45 = $1,260


Material Total:

$5,087


Labor Pricing


Excavation:

140 ÷ 25 = 5.6 hrs
5.6 × $65 = $364


Pipe Installation:

140 ÷ 12 = 11.7 hrs
11.7 × $72 = $842


Backfill/Compaction:

140 ÷ 30 = 4.7 hrs
4.7 × $65 = $306


Labor Total:

$1,512


Equipment

Mini-excavator, compactor, trench tools:
$1,250


Direct Cost

$5,087 + $1,512 + $1,250 = $7,849


O&P

Overhead 10%

$785

Profit 10%

$863


Tax (8% material)

$407


Final Earthwork & Wet Utilities Estimate:

$9,904


7. FINAL ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Cost ItemAmount
Materials$5,087
Labor$1,512
Equipment$1,250
Tax$407
O&P$1,648
Final Estimate Total$9,904

8. ESTIMATOR NOTES / PROFESSIONAL INSIGHTS

This scope is small in quantity but critical in sequencing, as it directly impacts plumbing, foundation restoration, and slab replacement.

Key cost drivers:

  1. Trenching under existing slab
  2. Utility tie-in complexity
  3. Backfill and compaction requirements
  4. Limited access conditions
  5. Coordination with plumbing and concrete trades

Even though only 140 LF of piping is installed, the cost reflects:

  • Mobilization inefficiencies
  • Interior excavation constraints
  • Coordination risks

Key Risks:

  • Unknown existing utility depth/location
  • Potential conflicts with structural elements
  • Soil variability
  • Inspection delays

Recommended Bid Clarifications:

  • Rock excavation excluded
  • Dewatering excluded
  • Existing utility locations assumed accurate
  • Compaction testing by others
  • One mobilization included

Last fact-checked and editorially reviewed on May 6, 2026.

How we created & reviewed this content:

We continually review and update this content.

DISCLAIMER

Profound Estimates besides its services, also provides independent, fact-checked information about construction estimates and material takeoffs for general reference only and images on this site maybe AI-Assisted where appropriate and relevant. Read our full disclaimer for details. Read the disclaimer

INFORMATION SOURCES

Profound Estimates follows strict sourcing standards, relying only on credible, verifiable data from manufacturers, industry benchmarks, and reputable publications. Learn more about how we ensure content accuracy and transparency in our Editorial Policy. Editorial Policy

EDITORIAL HISTORY

Our team of writers, editors, and reviewers continually monitors the construction industry and updates articles when new information becomes available. See how we maintain transparency and editorial integrity in our Editorial Policy. Editorial Policy

  • Current version (May 6, 2026)
    • Technically reviewed by Robert Hensley.
    • Edited by Rachel Nguyen.
DISCUSSION & FEEDBACK

We value reader insights and industry feedback to help us keep our content accurate and relevant. Learn how we handle reviews, corrections, and updates in our Editorial Policy. Editorial Policy

Leave a feedback on this post update at our social platforms.

CITE & SHARE

You’re welcome to cite and share profound estimates content for reference with proper attribution and a link back to the original article — helping more readers access trustworthy, well-researched construction information.

Profound Estimates. May 10, 2026. “Case Study: Earthwork & Wet Utilities Estimating – BHS Animal & Plant Science Remodel.” https://profoundestimates.com/case-studies/case-study-earthwork-wet-utilities-estimating-bhs-animal-plant-science-remodel.

Share on: Facebook | X (Twitter) | Reddit | Pinterest | Telegram | WhatsApp | LinkedIn | TikTok | Threads

More UPDATES